There are
many things that one must take into consideration when purchasing an unmanned
aerial system. Of course, one must first
decide what purpose the UAS will serve.
This will then lead to a decision on what sensors and capabilities the
UAS will need to have. One thing that a
user must determine is where sensors must be places to best fulfill their
purpose on the UAS. While UASs designed
for professional video and image capture and first-person view racing have very
similar looks, they are designed to be quite different. The remainder of this discussion will focus
on the design criteria and selection of a commercially available UAS for both
purposes.
There are many things that must be
considered when selecting an unmanned aerial system (UAS) for aerial video and
photography. One of the most important
factors to consider is the placement of the primary camera and the capabilities
of the primary camera. There are many
purpose built unmanned aerial systems for video and image capture. One of these systems, the DJI Phantom 4 Pro
V2.0 (Figure 1), is arguably one of the best ones on the market. Equipped with a one-inch, 20-megapixel camera
which can capture 4K video at 60 frames-per-second and still imagery at up to
14 frames-per-second. The Phantom 4 Pro
V2.0 can stream live video back to the control during flight using DJIs OcuSync
HD transmission system. Utilizing a dual
frequency transmission system, the OcuSync streaming video transmission can
provide crystal clear video at ranges of up to seven kilometers. Finally, the transmission system can
constantly assess the environment it is operating in and adjust to help
maintain the optimum signal and minimal interference (Phantom 4 pro v2, n.d.).
Figure 1: DJI Phantom 4 Pro V2.0 UAS for aerial video and imagery capture (Phantom 4 pro v2, n.d.) |
When it comes to the Phantom 4 Pro
V2.0, there are two main reasons that I selected it for use in video and still
photography. First, is the camera
placement. Mounted underneath the main
body of the UAS it is free from interference by the propellers and the body of
the vehicle. The only obstacle that the
camera must worry about is the landing gear for the vehicle. Luckily, the highly capable Flight Autonomy
system that DJI has created is capable of compensating for that. This is exactly why the Flight Autonomy
system is the second reason that I picked the Phantom 4 Pro V2.0. This Flight Autonomy software features full,
five-directions obstacle avoidance to help keep operators minds at ease and
focused on getting the perfect shot.
Finally, the Flight Autonomy features a hold of software for tracking
and safety to help operators efficiently operate the UAS (Phantom 4 Pro, n.d.).
A racing drone has many different
parts that must be considered. Eachine,
makes a highly capable first-person-view racing drone called the Wizard X220
(Figure 2). This racing UAS can achieve speeds
of up to 50 miles per hour and is highly maneuverable due to the way they have
the motors mounted and its light weight of only 364-grams (without a battery). It can fly for up to twelve minutes utilizing
either a 4S or 3S battery and has directional indicator lights for easy
directional control. It is controlled
via a 5.8 GHz handheld transmitter which can also receive a live video stream
back from the UAS for control purposes.
Many racers also utilize first-person-view goggles for flying the race,
which this UAS is easily setup for. The
main reason for choosing this UAS for racing is the way its front mounted
camera is setup. Many racing UAS have
the camera setup to only look directly forward.
However, the Wizard X220 has a front mounted camera that can tilt up and
down. This gives the operator maximum
forward view, even when the UAs is flying in the forward tilted attitude for
maximum forward speed (Eachine, n.d.).
This extra viewing angle could potentially help the operator to edge out
the competition when using the Wizard X220.
Figure 2: Wizard X220 First Person View Racing UAS (Eachine, n.d.) |
References:
Eachine Wizard
X220 FPV Racing Drone. (n.d.). Retrieved July 19, 2018, from
https://www.eachine.com/Eachine-Wizard-X220-FPV-Racing-Drone-Blheli_S-F3-6DOF-2205-2300KV-Motors-5_8G-48CH-200MW-VTX-700TVL-Camera-ARF-Version-p-569.html
Phantom 4 Pro -
Professional aerial filmmaking made easy. (n.d.). Retrieved July 19, 2018, from
https://www.dji.com/phantom-4-pro
Phantom 4 pro v2
| quadcopter for aerial photography. (n.d.). Retrieved July 19, 2018, from
https://www.dji.com/phantom-4-pro-v2?site=brandsite&from=homepage
These are both great options for aerial photography and aerial racing unmanned systems. I also chose a DJI unmanned system, though I went with the Mavic Pro instead of the Phantom. I agree with your reasoning for why the sensors on these particular drones are in their respective locations on the drone. Mission requirements will almost always come first for sensor placement, and these two models have their sensors properly placed for optimal performance.
ReplyDelete